# Gitlab Runner Some features of GitLab require a "[runner](https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/)" (_in the sense of a "gopher" or a "minion"_). A runner "registers" itself with a GitLab instance, and is given tasks to run. Tasks include running Continuous Integration (CI) builds, and building container images. While a runner isn't strictly required to use GitLab, if you want to do CI, you'll need at least one. There are many was to deploy a runner - this recipe focuses on the docker container model. ## Ingredients 1. [Docker swarm cluster](/ha-docker-swarm/) with [persistent shared storage](/ha-docker-swarm/shared-storage-ceph.md) 2. [GitLab](/ha-docker-swarm/gitlab) installation (see previous recipe) ## Preparation ### Setup data locations We'll need several directories to bind-mount into our runner containers, so create them in /var/data/gitlab: ``` cd /var/data mkdir gitlab cd gitlab mkdir -p {runners/1,runners/2} ``` ### Configure runners From your GitLab UI, you can retrieve a "token" necessary to register a new runner. To register the runner, you can either create config.toml in each runner's bind-mounted folder (example below), or just "docker exec" into each runner container and execute ```gitlab-container register``` to interactively generate config.toml. Sample runner config.toml: ``` concurrent = 1 check_interval = 0 [[runners]] name = "myrunner1" url = "https://gitlab.example.com" token = "" executor = "docker" [runners.docker] tls_verify = false image = "ruby:2.1" privileged = false disable_cache = false volumes = ["/cache"] shm_size = 0 [runners.cache] ``` ## Serving ### Launch runners Launch the mail server stack by running ```docker stack deploy gitlab-runner -c ``` Log into your new instance at https://**YOUR-FQDN**, with user "root" and the password you specified in gitlab.env. ## Chef's Notes 1. You'll note that I setup 2 runners. One is locked to a single project (this cookbook build), and the other is a shared runner. I wanted to ensure that one runner was always available to run CI for this project, even if I'd tied up another runner on something heavy-duty, like a container build. Customize this to your use case. 2. Originally I deployed runners in the same stack as GitLab, but I found that they would frequently fail to start properly when I launched the stack. I think that this was because the runners started so quickly (and GitLab starts so slowly!), that they always started up reporting that the GitLab instance was invalid or unavailable. I had issues with CI builds stuck permanently in a "pending" state, which were only resolved by restarting the runner. Having the runners deployed in a separate stack to GitLab avoids this problem.